High bias
- You see
- Both curves meet quickly, far above the floor. Small gap.
- More data?
- No. The curves are already flat.
- Fix
- More complexity, more features, less λ.
Do we need more data, or a different model? Pick a model, then grow the training set and watch where training and validation error settle. The gap between them is variance. How far they sit above the noise floor is bias.
Blue points train the model; orange points are held out to score it. Spread of the faint lines is variance. Distance between the average fit and the dashed truth is bias.
Press play on degree 10. At n = 10 the faint fits fly everywhere and the gap is huge. By n = 150 they have calmed down. Now try degree 1: the fits agree with each other from the start, but they all miss the curve in the same way, at every n.
On average, validation error can approach σ² but not go below it, because no model can predict the random noise. A small validation set gives a noisy score that can dip under the floor by luck. Raise the validation size and the orange curve steadies. Drop σ to 0.5 and the floor falls, so even the small cubic term suddenly matters and degree 2 starts to look biased.